mightymads: (Default)
mightymads ([personal profile] mightymads) wrote in [community profile] victorian221b2020-03-10 01:10 pm

Watson’s regiments

I found an interesting article which compares Watson’s military background with actual facts about the Fifth Northumberland Fusiliers and the Berkshires. As we remember, Watson introduces himself this way:

“In the year 1878 I took my degree of Doctor of Medicine of the University of London, and proceeded to Netley to go through the course prescribed for surgeons in the army. Having completed my studies there, I was duly attached to the Fifth Northumberland Fusiliers as Assistant Surgeon. The regiment was stationed in India at the time, and before I could join it, the second Afghan war had broken out. On landing at Bombay, I learned that my corps had advanced through the passes, and was already deep in the enemy's country. I followed, however, with many other officers who were in the same situation as myself, and succeeded in reaching Candahar in safety, where I found my regiment, and at once entered upon my new duties. [...] I was removed from my brigade and attached to the Berkshires, with whom I served at the fatal battle of Maiwand.”

So according to STUD, he served mostly in Afghanistan. However, RESI gives another picture:

“For myself, my term of service in India had trained me to stand heat better than cold, and a thermometer of 90 was no hardship.”

This quote implies that he served in India for some time which was enough for him to get used to its climate. Here’s what is said in the article upon the matter:

Watson would not have joined the 5th Fusiliers at Kandahar because that regiment was never stationed there. They were part of the Peshawar Valley Field Force and were employed in the Khyber Pass, the Bazar Valley, Landi Kotal and Jalalabad - all in the northern territories. It is more feasable for him to have joined up with the 66th (Berkshire) Regiment while at Bombay, though, staying with them, he would not have made it into Afghanistan until over a year later as they marched into the southern city of Kandahar early in 1880."

Of course, ACD is famous for the lack of consistency in his narratives, but what if we play the game and try to find another explanation for Watson's being an unreliable narrator?

He graduated in 1878. The prep course at Netley lasted for four months, which means that in late 1878 or early 1879 he embarked on his journey to India. Maybe, being attached to the Fusiliers, he did join them, although not in Kandahar, but say, in Jalalabad? Perhaps there was some conflict there. Knowing Watson's amiability and integrity, he must have had a good reason for it. After a very short time in Jalalabad, he was removed from his brigade, attached to the Berkshires and transferred back to Bombay. There he served for about a year and then marched with his regiment to Kandahar. When he was writing STUD, he was yet inexperienced in mystifications. He omitted the reason why he was reassigned, and hence inconsistencies in his narrative. Perhaps the fellow Fusiliers knew that reason very well, but an outsider would question the authenticity of Watson's tale. The reason itself could make a nice fic.
(deleted comment)