STUD, pt. 2, ch. 1-3
Sep. 28th, 2020 07:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My notes will be very brief for this part. Geographic inaccuracies in Doyle’s descriptions of America are neatly summarised in this essay by one of the Baker Street Irregulars. Still, I’d really like to know what American readers think of this part of the story. According to another source, Doyle’s portrayal of Mormons was most likely based on sensational press of that time. Again, I know next to nothing about Mormons and doubt that a Wikipedia article can substantially change that, so if anyone can give their expert opinion, please do share it! :)
Re: the plot itself, John Ferrier, Lucy’s adoptive father, is a baffling character. On the one hand, he is outlined as a seasoned adventurer, a self-reliant and self-sufficient man. On the other, he is a classic damsel in distress in the way he handles the proposal situation. One would expect from such a resourceful guy to come up with a plan to sneak away from his so-called benefactors long before the matter became pressing. He disagreed with their way of life and had concerns about Lucy’s future. Why didn’t he do anything? He had years to turn his possessions into cash and flee. What was he counting on if he knew how ruthless and despotic the rules in his new settlement were? What if Lucy never met Jefferson?
Or, okay, let’s imagine that he hoped that the problem would miraculously solve itself. But then Lucy is harassed and given a month to decide. A month, Carl! It’s not like they whisk her away at once. Again, Ferrier does nothing except sending a message to Jefferson, wtf. In those days before mobile phones and internet things could easily go wrong: the message might not be delivered or something could have happened to Jefferson. And if their harassers managed to get inside the house to leave warnings without being noticed by old Ferrier, he really must have been over the hill by then.
A side note: John and Lucy meet the Mormons on May 4, 1847. 1847 was indeed the year when a large group of Mormons led by Brigham Young travelled to Utah. Also, if we consider that Sherlock Holmes was born in 1854, his brother Mycroft, 7 years his senior, was born in 1847. And a few decades later May 4 will be the Reichenbach day.
Re: the plot itself, John Ferrier, Lucy’s adoptive father, is a baffling character. On the one hand, he is outlined as a seasoned adventurer, a self-reliant and self-sufficient man. On the other, he is a classic damsel in distress in the way he handles the proposal situation. One would expect from such a resourceful guy to come up with a plan to sneak away from his so-called benefactors long before the matter became pressing. He disagreed with their way of life and had concerns about Lucy’s future. Why didn’t he do anything? He had years to turn his possessions into cash and flee. What was he counting on if he knew how ruthless and despotic the rules in his new settlement were? What if Lucy never met Jefferson?
Or, okay, let’s imagine that he hoped that the problem would miraculously solve itself. But then Lucy is harassed and given a month to decide. A month, Carl! It’s not like they whisk her away at once. Again, Ferrier does nothing except sending a message to Jefferson, wtf. In those days before mobile phones and internet things could easily go wrong: the message might not be delivered or something could have happened to Jefferson. And if their harassers managed to get inside the house to leave warnings without being noticed by old Ferrier, he really must have been over the hill by then.
A side note: John and Lucy meet the Mormons on May 4, 1847. 1847 was indeed the year when a large group of Mormons led by Brigham Young travelled to Utah. Also, if we consider that Sherlock Holmes was born in 1854, his brother Mycroft, 7 years his senior, was born in 1847. And a few decades later May 4 will be the Reichenbach day.